You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The SUMMIT ambulatory-ICU primary care model for medically and socially complex patients in an urban federally qualified health center: study design and rationale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13722-018-0128-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian Chan, Samuel T. Edwards, Meg Devoe, Richard Gil, Matthew Mitchell, Honora Englander, Christina Nicolaidis, Devan Kansagara, Somnath Saha, P. Todd Korthuis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 67% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 386 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 9% |
| Researcher | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 64 | 17% |
| Unknown | 152 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 73 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 15% |
| Psychology | 26 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 11% |
| Unknown | 160 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,976,909
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#103
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,114
of 444,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.