You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-018-0393-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pernelle Smits, Jean-Louis Denis, Johanne Préval, Evert Lindquist, Miguel Aguirre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 27% |
| Ireland | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,104,069
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#562
of 1,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,755
of 409,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#32
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.