You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Resting blood pressure reductions following isometric handgrip exercise training and the impact of age and sex: protocol for a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-015-0164-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle C. Bentley, Cindy H. Nguyen, Scott G. Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,027,561
of 23,117,738 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,566
of 2,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,173
of 390,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#51
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,117,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.