You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility study of goal setting discussions between older adults and volunteers facilitated by an eHealth application: development of the Health TAPESTRY approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-018-0377-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dena Javadi, Larkin Lamarche, Ernie Avilla, Raied Siddiqui, Jessica Gaber, Mehreen Bhamani, Doug Oliver, Laura Cleghorn, Dee Mangin, Lisa Dolovich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,568,045
of 25,345,468 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#276
of 1,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,143
of 450,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,345,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.