↓ Skip to main content

Pathways leading to success and non-success: a process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity health promotion program applying fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathways leading to success and non-success: a process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity health promotion program applying fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-6284-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Kien, Ludwig Grillich, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Rudolf Schoberberger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 42 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 11%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Sports and Recreations 10 9%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 51 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,837,083
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,830
of 15,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,387
of 435,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#171
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.