You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Volatilomics: a non-invasive technique for screening plant phenotypic traits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0378-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Werner Jud, J. Barbro Winkler, Bishu Niederbacher, Simon Niederbacher, Jörg-Peter Schnitzler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 67% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 22% |
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,986,681
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#217
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,363
of 434,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.