↓ Skip to main content

Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: a discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: a discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12874-015-0010-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mattijs S Lambooij, Irene A Harmsen, Jorien Veldwijk, Hester de Melker, Liesbeth Mollema, Yolanda WM van Weert, G Ardine de Wit

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 114 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 20%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 13%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Psychology 10 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 37 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,522,742
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#981
of 2,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,822
of 259,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.