↓ Skip to main content

Open versus closed vitrification system of human oocytes and embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Open versus closed vitrification system of human oocytes and embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of embryologic and clinical outcomes
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12958-018-0440-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongcai Cai, Jean Damascene Niringiyumukiza, Yamin Li, Qiaohong Lai, Yinzhao Jia, Ping Su, Wenpei Xiang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Engineering 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 18 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#9,246,833
of 15,248,333 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#319
of 617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,682
of 381,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#39
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,248,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.