You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A sterile hydroponic system for characterising root exudates from specific root types and whole-root systems of large crop plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0380-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akitomo Kawasaki, Shoko Okada, Chunyan Zhang, Emmanuel Delhaize, Ulrike Mathesius, Alan E. Richardson, Michelle Watt, Matthew Gilliham, Peter R. Ryan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| Germany | 5 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Japan | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 50% |
| Scientists | 22 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 181 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Researcher | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 58 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,200,018
of 25,376,589 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#41
of 1,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,094
of 449,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.