You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pathogenic landscapes: Interactions between land, people, disease vectors, and their animal hosts
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, October 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-072x-9-54 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eric F Lambin, Annelise Tran, Sophie O Vanwambeke, Catherine Linard, Valérie Soti |
Abstract |
Landscape attributes influence spatial variations in disease risk or incidence. We present a review of the key findings from eight case studies that we conducted in Europe and West Africa on the impact of land changes on emerging or re-emerging vector-borne diseases and/or zoonoses. The case studies concern West Nile virus transmission in Senegal, tick-borne encephalitis incidence in Latvia, sandfly abundance in the French Pyrenees, Rift Valley Fever in the Ferlo (Senegal), West Nile Fever and the risk of malaria re-emergence in the Camargue, and rodent-borne Puumala hantavirus and Lyme borreliosis in Belgium. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 718 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
United States | 6 | <1% |
France | 6 | <1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Argentina | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 11 | 2% |
Unknown | 676 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 148 | 21% |
Researcher | 147 | 20% |
Student > Master | 112 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 43 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 5% |
Other | 128 | 18% |
Unknown | 102 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 261 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 98 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 39 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 37 | 5% |
Other | 102 | 14% |
Unknown | 131 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,106,314
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#31
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,455
of 108,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them