↓ Skip to main content

Porcine aminopeptidase N binds to F4+ enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli fimbriae

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Porcine aminopeptidase N binds to F4+ enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli fimbriae
Published in
Veterinary Research, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13567-016-0313-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pengpeng Xia, Yiting Wang, Congrui Zhu, Yajie Zou, Ying Yang, Wei Liu, Philip R. Hardwidge, Guoqiang Zhu

Abstract

F4(+) enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) strains cause diarrheal disease in neonatal and post-weaned piglets. Several different host receptors for F4 fimbriae have been described, with porcine aminopeptidase N (APN) reported most recently. The FaeG subunit is essential for the binding of the three F4 variants to host cells. Here we show in both yeast two-hybrid and pulldown assays that APN binds directly to FaeG, the major subunit of F4 fimbriae, from three serotypes of F4(+) ETEC. Modulating APN gene expression in IPEC-J2 cells affected ETEC adherence. Antibodies raised against APN or F4 fimbriae both reduced ETEC adherence. Thus, APN mediates the attachment of F4(+) E. coli to intestinal epithelial cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#1,035
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,317
of 409,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#23
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.