↓ Skip to main content

Mental health first aid training for the public: evaluation of effects on knowledge, attitudes and helping behavior

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
343 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mental health first aid training for the public: evaluation of effects on knowledge, attitudes and helping behavior
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, October 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-2-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Betty A Kitchener, Anthony F Jorm

Abstract

Many members of the public have poor mental health literacy. A Mental Health First Aid training course was developed in order to improve this. This paper describes the training course and reports an evaluation study looking at changes in knowledge, stigmatizing attitudes and help provided to others. Data are reported on the first 210 participants in public courses. Evaluation questionnaires were given at the beginning of courses, at the end and at 6 months follow-up. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach. The course improved participants' ability to recognize a mental disorder in a vignette, changed beliefs about treatment to be more like those of health professionals, decreased social distance from people with mental disorders, increased confidence in providing help to someone with a mental disorder, and increased the amount of help provided to others. Mental Health First Aid training appears to be an effective method of improving mental health literacy which can be widely applied.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Uganda 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Unknown 338 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 15%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Researcher 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 78 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 104 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 13%
Social Sciences 38 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 86 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,514,327
of 23,385,346 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#487
of 4,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,406
of 47,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,385,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them