↓ Skip to main content

Detecting myocardial infarction in critical illness using screening troponin measurements and ECG recordings

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detecting myocardial infarction in critical illness using screening troponin measurements and ECG recordings
Published in
Critical Care, March 2008
DOI 10.1186/cc6815
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wendy Lim, Paula Holinski, PJ Devereaux, Andrea Tkaczyk, Ellen McDonald, France Clarke, Ismael Qushmaq, Irene Terrenato, Holger Schunemann, Mark Crowther, Deborah Cook

Abstract

To use screening cardiac troponin (cTn) measurements and electrocardiograms (ECGs) to determine the incidence of elevated cTn and of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and to assess whether these findings influence prognosis. This is a prospective screening study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Professor 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2008.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,469
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,340
of 95,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.