↓ Skip to main content

Which components or attributes of biodiversity influence which dimensions of poverty?

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which components or attributes of biodiversity influence which dimensions of poverty?
Published in
Environmental Evidence, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-3-3
Authors

Dilys Roe, Max Fancourt, Chris Sandbrook, Mxolisi Sibanda, Alessandra Giuliani, Andrew Gordon-Maclean

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 3%
United States 4 2%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 184 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 16%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 60 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 24%
Social Sciences 20 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 46 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#244
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,720
of 238,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.