↓ Skip to main content

Intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on weight loss and cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
twitter
63 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages
video
19 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
431 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on weight loss and cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12967-018-1748-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iolanda Cioffi, Andrea Evangelista, Valentina Ponzo, Giovannino Ciccone, Laura Soldati, Lidia Santarpia, Franco Contaldo, Fabrizio Pasanisi, Ezio Ghigo, Simona Bo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 431 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 96 22%
Student > Master 45 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 6%
Other 22 5%
Other 68 16%
Unknown 148 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 5%
Sports and Recreations 22 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 4%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 159 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 188. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#216,072
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#61
of 4,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,542
of 448,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.