↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of enteric dysbiosis in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of enteric dysbiosis in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0909-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Du Preez, M. Corbitt, H. Cabanas, N. Eaton, D. Staines, S. Marshall-Gradisnik

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Other 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 44 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 47 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#494,616
of 24,394,820 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#55
of 2,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,423
of 444,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,394,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.