You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The interplay between metabolic alterations, diastolic strain rate and exercise capacity in mild heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-018-0511-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Masliza Mahmod, Nikhil Pal, Jennifer Rayner, Cameron Holloway, Betty Raman, Sairia Dass, Eylem Levelt, Rina Ariga, Vanessa Ferreira, Rajarshi Banerjee, Jurgen E. Schneider, Christopher Rodgers, Jane M. Francis, Theodoros D. Karamitsos, Michael Frenneaux, Houman Ashrafian, Stefan Neubauer, Oliver Rider |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 14% |
Colombia | 4 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
United States | 3 | 8% |
Mexico | 3 | 8% |
Chile | 2 | 5% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Egypt | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 68% |
Scientists | 5 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 34% |
Engineering | 6 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
Materials Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 26 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,730,356
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#54
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,055
of 446,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.