You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route in critically ill patients: a single center feasibility trial of the PEP uP protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc8991 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daren K Heyland, Naomi E Cahill, Rupinder Dhaliwal, Miao Wang, Andrew G Day, Ahmed Alenzi, Fiona Aris, John Muscedere, John W Drover, Stephen A McClave |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a new feeding protocol designed to enhance the delivery of enteral nutrition (EN). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Paraguay | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,884
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,622
of 104,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#12
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.