You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol for treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures; a systematic review with network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0912-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brad Meulenkamp, Dawn Stacey, Dean Fergusson, Brian Hutton, Risa Shorr MLIS, Ian D. Graham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 166 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Researcher | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 87 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,090,779
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#333
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,389
of 448,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#19
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.