You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combined use of cutinase and high-resolution mass-spectrometry to query the molecular architecture of cutin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-018-0384-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rupam Kumar Bhunia, Lucas J. Showman, Adarsh Jose, Basil J. Nikolau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#12,921,044
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#558
of 1,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,432
of 437,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#16
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.