↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12955-018-1066-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fei-Fei Huang, Qing Yang, An-ni Wang, Jing-Ping Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Other 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Sports and Recreations 9 10%
Psychology 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 21 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,269,124
of 15,442,255 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#175
of 1,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,808
of 383,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#58
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,442,255 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.