↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychometric properties and performance of existing self-efficacy instruments in cancer populations: a systematic review
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12955-018-1066-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fei-Fei Huang, Qing Yang, An-ni Wang, Jing-Ping Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 5 4%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 45 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 32 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Sports and Recreations 9 8%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 40 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,615,511
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#306
of 2,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,459
of 437,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#19
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.