You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study protocol testing toolkit versus usual care for implementation of screening, brief intervention, referral to treatment in hospitals: a phased cluster randomized approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13722-018-0130-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin Newhouse, Michelle Janney, Anne Gilbert, Jon Agley, Giorgos Bakoyannis, Melora Ferren, C. Daniel Mullins, Meg Johantgen, Rhonda Schwindt, Kelli Thoele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 15% |
| Psychology | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,721,995
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#172
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,411
of 445,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.