↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of DSD training schools organized by cost action BM1303 “DSDnet”

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of DSD training schools organized by cost action BM1303 “DSDnet”
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13023-018-0967-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Bertalan, A. Lucas-Herald, Z. Kolesinska, M. Berra, Martine Cools, A. Balsamo, O. Hiort

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Unknown 9 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 8 62%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#11,991,206
of 15,071,243 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,341
of 1,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,574
of 378,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#135
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,071,243 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.