You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Evolutionary, structural and functional analysis of the caleosin/peroxygenase gene family in the Fungi
BMC Genomics, December 2018
Farzana Rahman, Mehedi Hassan, Abdulsamie Hanano, David A. Fitzpatrick, Charley G. P. McCarthy, Denis J. Murphy
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Syrian Arab Republic||1||14%|
|Members of the public||2||29%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||11||34%|
|Student > Bachelor||5||16%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||3%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||16||50%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||9||28%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
of 10,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 440,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.