↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive Load Theory for debriefing simulations: implications for faculty development

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Simulation, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 278)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
95 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive Load Theory for debriefing simulations: implications for faculty development
Published in
Advances in Simulation, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41077-018-0086-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin L. Fraser, Michael J. Meguerdichian, Jolene T. Haws, Vincent J. Grant, Komal Bajaj, Adam Cheng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 23 16%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 38 26%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 17%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 35 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2022.
All research outputs
#611,988
of 25,589,756 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#11
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,756
of 447,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,589,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.