↓ Skip to main content

The generation of consensus guidelines for carrying out process evaluations in rehabilitation research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The generation of consensus guidelines for carrying out process evaluations in rehabilitation research
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12874-018-0647-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Masterson-Algar, C. R. Burton, J. Rycroft-Malone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 24%
Psychology 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,482,901
of 25,171,741 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#361
of 2,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,957
of 449,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#21
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,171,741 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.