You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Infection prevalence and ecotypes of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in moose Alces alces, red deer Cervus elaphus, roe deer Capreolus capreolus and Ixodes ricinus ticks from Norway
Parasites & Vectors, January 2019
Vetle M. Stigum, Ryanne I. Jaarsma, Hein Sprong, Christer M. Rolandsen, Atle Mysterud
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||16||89%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||7||14%|
|Student > Bachelor||6||12%|
|Student > Master||5||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||14||27%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||8||16%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||4||8%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||2||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
of 24,758,493 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
of 5,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 448,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,758,493 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.