↓ Skip to main content

Outcome of surgical repair of Pectus Excavatum in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcome of surgical repair of Pectus Excavatum in adults
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13019-017-0635-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayman M. Shaalan, Ibrahim Kasb, Eman E. Elwakeel, Yusra A. Elkamali

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Master 7 17%
Researcher 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2019.
All research outputs
#16,388,648
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#433
of 1,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,455
of 319,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.