↓ Skip to main content

The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0925-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caitlin E. Kennedy, Virginia A. Fonner, Kevin A. Armstrong, Julie A. Denison, Ping Teresa Yeh, Kevin R. O’Reilly, Michael D. Sweat

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 35 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Psychology 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 34 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,519,530
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#221
of 2,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,815
of 450,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#13
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.