You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0925-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Caitlin E. Kennedy, Virginia A. Fonner, Kevin A. Armstrong, Julie A. Denison, Ping Teresa Yeh, Kevin R. O’Reilly, Michael D. Sweat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 4 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Canada | 2 | 8% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
Russia | 1 | 4% |
Denmark | 1 | 4% |
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 54% |
Scientists | 9 | 35% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Researcher | 4 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 35 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
Psychology | 6 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 34 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,519,530
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#221
of 2,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,815
of 450,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#13
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.