↓ Skip to main content

Patient medical costs for tuberculosis treatment and impact on adherence in China: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient medical costs for tuberculosis treatment and impact on adherence in China: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-393
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qian Long, Helen Smith, Tuohong Zhang, Shenglan Tang, Paul Garner

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 123 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 25%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Other 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 30 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2013.
All research outputs
#5,604,920
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,106
of 11,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,861
of 350,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them