You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Information management for high content live cell imaging
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-10-226 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel Jameson, David A Turner, John Ankers, Stephnie Kennedy, Sheila Ryan, Neil Swainston, Tony Griffiths, David G Spiller, Stephen G Oliver, Michael RH White, Douglas B Kell, Norman W Paton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 30% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 40% |
Computer Science | 6 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2009.
All research outputs
#5,610,853
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,047
of 7,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,787
of 110,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.