You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The orphan child: humanities in modern medical education
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13010-018-0067-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary E. Kollmer Horton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 38% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 38% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 10% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,374,967
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#30
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,259
of 447,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them