↓ Skip to main content

Eosinopenia is a reliable marker of sepsis on admission to medical intensive care units

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eosinopenia is a reliable marker of sepsis on admission to medical intensive care units
Published in
Critical Care, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/cc6883
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khalid Abidi, Ibtissam Khoudri, Jihane Belayachi, Naoufel Madani, Aicha Zekraoui, Amine Zeggwagh, Redouane Abouqal

Abstract

Eosinopenia is a cheap and forgotten marker of acute infection that has not been evaluated previously in intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of the present study was to test the value of eosinopenia in the diagnosis of sepsis in patients admitted to ICUs.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Spain 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 66%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 18 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,999,547
of 19,287,605 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,400
of 5,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,616
of 235,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#106
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,287,605 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.