You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Geographical disparities in treatment and health care costs for end-of-life cancer patients in China: a retrospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-018-5237-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anli Leng, Jun Jing, Stephen Nicholas, Jian Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ghana | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 36 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 41 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,560,398
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,985
of 8,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,218
of 438,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#57
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,392 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.