↓ Skip to main content

Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 513)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
90 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40900-018-0136-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Calum F. Leask, Marlene Sandlund, Dawn A. Skelton, Teatske M. Altenburg, Greet Cardon, Mai J. M. Chinapaw, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Maite Verloigne, Sebastien F. M. Chastin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 407 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 16%
Researcher 55 14%
Student > Master 52 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 6%
Lecturer 16 4%
Other 62 15%
Unknown 130 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 11%
Social Sciences 42 10%
Psychology 26 6%
Sports and Recreations 16 4%
Other 66 16%
Unknown 165 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#664,062
of 25,480,126 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#27
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,284
of 447,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,480,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.