↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of a clinically integrated e-learning course in evidence-based medicine: A cluster randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of a clinically integrated e-learning course in evidence-based medicine: A cluster randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Medical Education, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-9-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina Kulier, Sjors FPJ Coppus, Javier Zamora, Julie Hadley, Sadia Malick, Kausik Das, Susanne Weinbrenner, Berrit Meyerrose, Tamas Decsi, Andrea R Horvath, Eva Nagy, Jose I Emparanza, Theodoros N Arvanitis, Amanda Burls, Juan B Cabello, Marcin Kaczor, Gianni Zanrei, Karen Pierer, Katarzyna Stawiarz, Regina Kunz, Ben WJ Mol, Khalid S Khan

Abstract

To evaluate the educational effects of a clinically integrated e-learning course for teaching basic evidence-based medicine (EBM) among postgraduates compared to a traditional lecture-based course of equivalent content.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 118 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 19 15%
Other 12 9%
Professor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 42 32%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 40%
Social Sciences 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Computer Science 11 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,102,830
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,248
of 3,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,811
of 92,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.