You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Work disability remains a major problem in rheumatoid arthritis in the 2000s: data from 32 countries in the QUEST-RA Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis Research & Therapy, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/ar2951 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tuulikki Sokka, Hannu Kautiainen, Theodore Pincus, Suzanne MM Verstappen, Amita Aggarwal, Rieke Alten, Daina Andersone, Humeira Badsha, Eva Baecklund, Miguel Belmonte, Jürgen Craig-Müller, Licia Maria Henrique da Mota, Alexander Dimic, Nihal A Fathi, Gianfranco Ferraccioli, Wataru Fukuda, Pál Géher, Feride Gogus, Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni, Hisham Hamoud, Glenn Haugeberg, Dan Henrohn, Kim Horslev-Petersen, Ruxandra Ionescu, Dmitry Karateew, Reet Kuuse, Ieda Maria Magalhaes Laurindo, Juris Lazovskis, Reijo Luukkainen, Ayman Mofti, Eithne Murphy, Ayako Nakajima, Omondi Oyoo, Sapan C Pandya, Christof Pohl, Denisa Predeteanu, Mjellma Rexhepi, Sylejman Rexhepi, Banwari Sharma, Eisuke Shono, Jean Sibilia, Stanislaw Sierakowski, Fotini N Skopouli, Sigita Stropuviene, Sergio Toloza, Ivo Valter, Anthony Woolf, Hisashi Yamanaka, the QUEST-RA study group |
| Abstract |
Work disability is a major consequence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), associated not only with traditional disease activity variables, but also more significantly with demographic, functional, occupational, and societal variables. Recent reports suggest that the use of biologic agents offers potential for reduced work disability rates, but the conclusions are based on surrogate disease activity measures derived from studies primarily from Western countries. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 58 | 24% |
| Unknown | 53 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 60 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,958,777
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#312
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,854
of 102,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.