↓ Skip to main content

Mixed-method approaches to strengthen economic evaluations in implementation research

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
66 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mixed-method approaches to strengthen economic evaluations in implementation research
Published in
Implementation Science, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-018-0850-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex R. Dopp, Peter Mundey, Lana O. Beasley, Jane F. Silovsky, Daniel Eisenberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Other 8 5%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 40 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Psychology 11 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 5%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 49 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,074,023
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#164
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,919
of 447,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.