↓ Skip to main content

Trends in neonicotinoid pesticide residues in food and water in the United States, 1999–2015

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends in neonicotinoid pesticide residues in food and water in the United States, 1999–2015
Published in
Environmental Health, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12940-018-0441-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hillary A. Craddock, Dina Huang, Paul C. Turner, Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, Devon C. Payne-Sturges

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Student > Bachelor 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Researcher 7 7%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 20%
Environmental Science 16 15%
Chemistry 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 29 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#520,028
of 16,920,965 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#126
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,467
of 391,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#13
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,920,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.