↓ Skip to main content

Trends in neonicotinoid pesticide residues in food and water in the United States, 1999–2015

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends in neonicotinoid pesticide residues in food and water in the United States, 1999–2015
Published in
Environmental Health, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12940-018-0441-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hillary A. Craddock, Dina Huang, Paul C. Turner, Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, Devon C. Payne-Sturges

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Master 24 11%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 77 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 15%
Environmental Science 25 11%
Chemistry 16 7%
Engineering 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 103 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#562,837
of 24,990,015 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#157
of 1,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,049
of 448,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#7
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,990,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.