You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: lessons from the theory of communities of practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-64 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roman Kislov, Gill Harvey, Kieran Walshe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 11% |
| Librarian | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 46 | 20% |
| Unknown | 38 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 46 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 25 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,638
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,488
of 126,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.