↓ Skip to main content

A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlin L. Rafie, Emily B. Zimmerman, Dawn E. Moser, Sarah Cook, Fatemeh Zarghami

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Other 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,674,205
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#332
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,021
of 439,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.