↓ Skip to main content

A dual continuum model of the reasons for use of complementary health approaches among overweight and obese adults: findings from the 2012 NHIS

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A dual continuum model of the reasons for use of complementary health approaches among overweight and obese adults: findings from the 2012 NHIS
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12906-018-2404-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawn M. Upchurch, Linghui Liang, Fuschia M. Sirois

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 15 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Psychology 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 17 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,030,198
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,853
of 3,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,918
of 435,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#56
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.