You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Barriers and enablers to implementing a virtual tertiary-regional Telemedicine Rounding and Consultation (TRAC) model of inpatient pediatric care using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) approach: a study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-018-3859-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sumedh Bele, Christine Cassidy, Janet Curran, David W. Johnson, Chad Saunders, J.A. Michelle Bailey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 55 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,988,554
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,787
of 7,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,562
of 437,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#68
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.