You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physiological roles of taurine in heart and muscle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1423-0127-17-s1-s2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen W Schaffer, Chian Ju Jong, Ramila KC, Junichi Azuma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 17% |
| Researcher | 41 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,860,579
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#318
of 1,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,959
of 104,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.