↓ Skip to main content

Experience with AMS 700 LGX penile prostheses for preserving penile length in Korea

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Urology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experience with AMS 700 LGX penile prostheses for preserving penile length in Korea
Published in
BMC Urology, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12894-018-0425-5
Authors

Kang Sup Kim, Woong Jin Bae, Sae Woong Kim, Moo Yeon Lee

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Unspecified 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#10,756,642
of 14,155,626 outputs
Outputs from BMC Urology
#241
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,145
of 318,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Urology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,155,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them