You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Health policy regulations pertaining to advanced surgical devices—their socio-economic effects on ophthalmology practice
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, January 2019
Dana Barequet, Aviad Tur-Sinai, Irit Barequet
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||5||18%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||11%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||7%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||8||29%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||11%|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||2||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
of 584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 438,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.