↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
408 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review
Published in
Implementation Science, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13012-018-0851-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Boland, Ian D. Graham, France Légaré, Krystina Lewis, Janet Jull, Allyson Shephard, Margaret L. Lawson, Alexandra Davis, Audrey Yameogo, Dawn Stacey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 408 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 9%
Student > Master 38 9%
Other 22 5%
Other 76 19%
Unknown 147 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 15%
Social Sciences 24 6%
Psychology 22 5%
Unspecified 11 3%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 164 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,470,956
of 25,321,938 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#256
of 1,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,260
of 450,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,321,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.