You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A critical analysis of purchasing arrangements in Kenya: the case of micro health insurance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-018-3863-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth Munge, Stephen Mulupi, Edwine Barasa, Jane Chuma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 10 | 45% |
| South Africa | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,068,371
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#798
of 7,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,175
of 437,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#24
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.