You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-11-22 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martha Nowosielski, Michael Schocke, Agnes Mayr, Kathrin Pedarnig, Gert Klug, Almut Köhler, Thomas Bartel, Silvana Müller, Thomas Trieb, Otmar Pachinger, Bernhard Metzler |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with emphasis on the analysis of left ventricular function and left ventricular wall motion characteristics. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 47 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 20% |
Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 54% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,156,510
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#317
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,145
of 122,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.