You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What, why and how do health systems learn from one another? Insights from eight low- and middle-income country case studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-018-0410-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Witter, Ian Anderson, Peter Annear, Abiodun Awosusi, Nitin N. Bhandari, Nouria Brikci, Blandine Binachon, Tata Chanturidze, Katherine Gilbert, Charity Jensen, Tomas Lievens, Barbara McPake, Snehashish Raichowdhury, Alex Jones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 10% |
| France | 6 | 5% |
| Australia | 5 | 4% |
| South Africa | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 62% |
| Scientists | 25 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 53 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 59 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#533,025
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#27
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,111
of 449,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.